*PhotoBlocker Spray

is dat legal? lol

that sounds retarded imo

i would imagine it's both retarded, and illegal. that, or it just plain doesn't work.

what's the best way to avoid a speeding ticket? don't speed.

Sounds like it is just High Gloss Clear Coat paint being resold as this retarded shit. I mean if you try to take a picture of a glass like surface with a flash you get the light refracted back to the lens and it basically overexposes the photo. So that sounds like all it is to me. But the stupid part is that if you take a picture of it at an off angle where the light can reflect away from the camera the image is still going to be clear or atleast I think. I'm gonna have to call bullshit on this one.

I have it, it works.

Even if you take the picture at an off angle and not straight on?

I’m not going to dignify that childish comment with a response ma'am.

/\
hahahahahahaah

take a picture of your plates and post it

i have also seen reports of it working. it was on a local news station. they had a police officer do the tests. i'm sure someone can find the video if they look. they closed down an intersection with photo enforcement and did some tests. it seemed to work as advertised. also, they said it wouldn't work with a normal camera becuase the flash isn't bright enough

here, since no one else wanted to look, i found the videos of it being tested (most in bright daylight). i'm not saying people should use it or drive carelessly, i'm just giving you guys more info

http://photoblocker.reachlocal.com/...421&dynamic_proxy=0&primary_serv=photoblocker

the link doesn't take you strait to the page, so click on "police test" on the left hand side.

Wow, thats pretty hot damn cool, I still think its just clear coat though

Hey I posted bout this a while ago....

http://TRDforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=118&highlight=photoblocker

newayz, yes it works.....the ebay link thats on my thread had about 8 videos from news documentaries that all tested the product.....they said it works and plus, they also researched the laws and said its NOT illegal....ill see if i can find these videos again...

UPDATE: Here are the videos....all are formatted for Windows Media Player and also for DSL/Cable

Fox News, Denver, CO
Click here


Fox News, Washington DC
Click here

ABC News, Washington DC
Click here

NBC News, Baltimore, MD
Click here

CBS News, Bakersfield, CA
Click here

Tech TV Review
Click here

CBS News, San Francisco, CA
Click here

CBS News, The Early Show
Click here

or u can just get the hideaway plates from autoloc

They need to make decals that only show up under intense light so like when the camera takes a picture it has the middle finger instead of your #

And you just go around assumeing everyone who has something that could prevent getting a unfair redlight ticket just drive around running redlights? I have you know I have a clean driving record and have never intentionally ran a red light.

Only thing I said was I have used the spray and you come in all high and mighty trying to start shit! Well the second thing I have you know is i'm above that and i'm not goina get trapped in a stupid internet arguement.

just think of Eandree as the parent who yells at you cuz they love you lol

fuCK THAT BIATCH!!!!

Yeah I put Eandree on my ignore list because I got sick of him picking fights and being all high and mighty, this forum is a way more positive experience without his banter.

As with any product - effectiveness is also a function of product application. Some people may get it to work, some may not. If the stuff really worked that well - I'd bet money that the defense department would be throwing money at it. Last time I checked - hasn't happened. I'd say the spray is 10% effective, 90% BS. There have been other video reviews on the product and they found it to be uneffective against Photo systems (research labs in Texas, Virigina, Washington - FOX news review in Oregon to name a few).

Concept is not new - but the packaging is. As for legality - some states ban any type of covering over the plate. If a spray is that much different from a cover - that is for the attorneys and judges to decide. Don't want to get your plate photo'd and be less expensive - easy - BLACK PAINT and you'll get that bonus "stealth" look.

lets be realistic here... your license plate gets dirty as fuck and fast. All these tests look like they were taken of clean plates with a fresh application of this stuff. as the plate gets dirty the stuff will become less effective. so unless you polish your plates daily I bet this stuff would be worthless. sorry for the errors but I typed this on my cellphone...

Do you guys think the corollacustomz licence plate cover will have the same effect?

Well I wouldnt say he's necessarily someone who breaks the law consistantly but more like it would be the same reason people have radar detectors. I kno some people who have never seen a ticket in their lives or have hardly driven over the speed limit intentionally and carelessly who have a radar detector. When I asked those people why they have it since they dont speed, their responses are all along the same lines of "it gives me added peace of mind". We can all never be too safe or over protected. Recently it snowed over here in Tulsa and cops were out in full force running what is called "operation slick streets". I came up to an intersection and couldnt stop and just continued to slide. I was not speeding, as a matter of fact, I was going 15 below the limit (30 in a 45) but because it was a downhill street and Tulsa waits til the next day to do anything to the roads I only had to tap my brakes to make my car slide. I slid through the light and halfway into the middle of the intersection and couldnt help it at all and thankfully I didnt cause an accident. Waiting on cross traffic for their light to turn green was a cop and thankfully he didnt pull me over for running that light but apparently he understood the fact that I couldnt help myself n didnt even bother pulling me over. If it had been someone sitting in a nice warm office whos job all day is to look at pictures of people's license plates who have ran stoplights being ill-considerate of the conditions, then I probably wouldve ended up with a citation but thats one time where I was glad for police judgement. On that day, I technically broke the law but Tulsa has no photo radars. That would be one day in which I couldve used that photoblocker stuff if Tulsa had indeed installed photo radars. (one mile later when the road went all uphill to the next stoplight, my car got stuck for 20 minutes cuz it couldnt make it uphill along with a plethora of others who just kept sliding and used the nearby curbs or cars to run into to come to a complete stop)

E_andree, man what is your problem? You used to be cool, but now all you do is try to start fights. You like go to any posts that can be interpreted offensively and start acting dumb trying to piss someone off or instigate shit. You have to realize that this board is a place to share idea, people express ideas here they are not neccessary serious about them. You are a tool. Grow up please.

If you notice e_andrea is also dominates the posts in the Rant and Debate sections. He just loves to fight and self appoint himself as being right. It is sort of wierd.

I would think that in that situation, the person interpreting the pictures would take that into consideration. They look at speed, weather conditions, time between lights, etc